Quote:
Originally Posted by killjoymeg
I loved ac 3  i loved the design and the plot, though i didnt like the mass of quick time events. I hate that people say connor was a bland/boring character, i prefer him to ezio. The only thing i didnt like was the modern day part of the game, it should have been longer. We finally got to play as desmond for it to end like that :/ (although i still think watch dogs is a modern day version) I wasnt a fan of the dlc though, i felt that after all the effort ubi made into portraying realistic tribes etc they just went and made him a stereotypical portrayal. What did you think?
Also do you know what the official name for the cardboard steelbook is? ive been trying to find what its officially called for a while |
I think you will do very well to find a ACR saga box as there only 4 in the hands of collectors
I loved the DLC as it was something new, and I liked how they had a different take on everything. It helped keep it fresh and playing that was the most fun I remember having in AC single player ever using the cloak to kill people
I agree I thought at least a third of the game (5 hours plus) would have been played as Desmond, and the lake of canoes /kayaks was pretty much the only disappointments to me
I agree watchdogs looks like ACV/VI
I also don't get why people say that want new games like old games when they can just replay the old games
I likes how Connor was a fresh new character, although I saw a few things they could have expanded on but did not, but the longer i Leave it between playing it the more I forget what I didn't like and just remember what I liked and its the same for everyone and that's why people love Altair even though the game was so relative (on purpose)
And people love Ezio even though when revelations came out most people where like OMG another game with the same character bit now most people remember AC2BR as one game and that's why they love Ezio