Quote:
Originally Posted by Viridius
Telling people that their opinion is right or wrong wont change their opinion, and might even just upset them. Its not like their opinion will change wether you get the statue or not right?
|
My post was in relation to people stating that a 1/3, 34 inch limited edition Prime 1 statue at $899 is over-priced. This is extremely far from the truth, given that the Prime 1 Transformers line of statues (while smaller and more detailed) were over $2000 (or just under). In comparison, the Batman is very good value for money (as opposed to too expensive).
Quote:
Originally Posted by utta
That 70 chevelle WAS someones first car. It WAS someone's first BEATER car. As you said. It's all about context correct? As far as limited edition? Are you insane? It had a production run of around 660,000. If that's "limited" then I'd hate to see what you consider a normal production run.
And you fail to realize that someone beater can can become rare and worth something. Just because a $100 statue is in YOUR eyes not worth it, it doesn't mean that it CAN'T be worth more down the line.
|
Mind providing us all a link for where the car person bought the specific Chevy you linked above for under $1000 as their first BEATER car?
Point is, if someone bought a BEATER car, they would not be taking care of it and it would be in sub-standard condition and poorly maintained. The car you linked, is not a BEATER car, its a showroom car, hence why its in a showroom.
My comment was directed towards people comparing a car with little value (and depreciating value) against a limited edition 1/3 scale Prime 1 statue. Your comment is discussing car value claims which has nothing to do with this thread.