|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Assassin's Creed Syndicate Charing Cross Edition, Rooks Edition & Big Ben Collect
Quote:
A statue, a map, a lithograph, a flask and a few other small goodies, WHAT ELSE DO YOU NEED? They're called collector's editions for a reason. Adding an OPTIONAL DLC at rrp (season pass) is simply price gouging. The season pass should be a CHOICE for people who still want the nicest COLLECTIBLES, not have it forced on them. You could argue its not forced on them as you could simply buy the Charing Cross edition (but why settle for cheaper collectibles just because you don't want to pay for an OPTIONAL DLC that is not required to get the full game experience?). Your logic is completely flawed. The reason you pay $30 is so you support the DEVELOPERS of the game so they can continue making Assassin's Creed games. THAT'S WHY. The only thing you're supporting by shelling over $150 for extras is increasing price for future editions (noticed the price has climbed steadily over the last 3-4 years?). The resellers who buy the collector's editions and sell them for double are people like yourself who place more value on scarcity than actual quality. What makes you even think for a moment I would pay double, let alone the current asking price for a collector's edition for a game that has not even been released yet? I didn't think the Unity collector's edition was worth the money but bought it based on previous high scores for Assassin's Creed games. I EXPECTED a HIGHLY POLISHED PC game, and got the exact opposite for the first time in Assassin's Creed history. Unity was a complete flop upon release and has received by far the worst scores of any Assassin's Creed game. Suffice to say, I am very worried about the quality of Syndicate upon release if recent history is anything to go by. Sure Ubisoft more or less fixed the game via patches, but releasing a substandard game after people paid over $150 for it is COMPLETELY unacceptable and the reviews reflect my sentiments: http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/as...y/user-reviews Yes, 2.3 out of 10. I am sorry, but your logic is completely and utterly flawed and just because you've decided to blindly heap praise on a company that as of late, does not deserve it, doesn't make your arguments valid. Last edited by dwade23; 05-20-2015 at 03:53 PM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|