![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Truly Beautiful Ras
![]() Although your complaints are perfectly reasonable As neither of those pieces were cheap by any standard You pay for quality service
__________________
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
I've got the rest of my life To buy things that I don't need |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm thinking about getting Shadow of the Shard
If somehow they offer partial refund Let me know Maybe I can help you with that I don't mind the imperfection |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
wow.. you got some beautiful pieces! Specially the shadow of the shard! I too don't mind the imperfections.. actually i prefer them as they add an unique touch to that specific piece.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Details.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Overall the sharpness/detail is better in the Mirror's Edge piece. This is down to the artist who did the concept/the style of said artist. Citadel shouldn't be viewed up close, a little distance works much better. "Sand4Fish" you just let me know if you want your collection made more unique. I've got a hammer, stanley knife and such. ![]()
__________________
I've got the rest of my life To buy things that I don't need Last edited by rasmusvn; 05-10-2013 at 08:54 AM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow looks brilliant and so shiny
![]() |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Team arrived.
Best I can do with photos for now. Colors are somewhat incorrect. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Reflections you say, what reflections? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
I've got the rest of my life To buy things that I don't need |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Stunning Ras!
![]() If I ever become crazy rich I will find one of the teams whatever the cost Now only to become crazy rich sigh take it you are very happy with the Team? Is that a giclee technically as it's so large and majestic?
__________________
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
#bbkl
We'll see what happens. I'll let you know. #Swiftdeath Very happe with it. It's a giclee as long as you use an inkjet. You could get the print itself for a lot less but keeping it in a tube isn't really the same ![]() There's always thumb thacks. Unpackaging it by yourself is impossible, I guess that's obvious. #Sand4fish I see your point. If the dots were in the white areas, I would never have noticed them. I always have an "internal" debate with myself: "Can this be justified?". Sometimes there's a good reason for imperfections, but most of the times that isn't the case. Let's say somethings is made out of wood, stone fx.. It's a natural material, so there's bound to be imperfections. An actual painting will have imperfections too. But a print made using the best paper, inks, technique at this price point should have no imperfections. A standard frame made of wood might have imperfections, but with diasec/epoxy there's no such thing. You can actually reheat the epoxy if the piece is scratched. --- I wanted to talk a little about the gloss process. C&B uses "Hahnem?hle FineArt Photo Rag Bright White 310gr" (http://www.hahnemuehle.com/media/pho...hite_rev02.pdf). It's a very high quality paper that I would say is heavily textured. I had a crop sent of "The Team" before the actual order was placed; in my opinion the colors were a little dull and the obvious texturing of the paper annoyed me a little. The same texturing can be seen on some of the AC-giclees. ![]() I've seen this texturing on a lot og high quality paper. Does anyone know if there's a abvious reason for this? Both the gloss and diasec-process make the works seem smooth. I guess the gel or epoxy fills out the small "gaps" in the paper.
__________________
I've got the rest of my life To buy things that I don't need |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|