![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not trying to argue, but I don't see anything wrong with buyers having to cover the fee. If you're selling me an item for $50, you don't expect to get paid $48.50 for it because you have to cover the fees. Just saying. It's kind of like paying the sales tax. You see something advertised for $99.99, you know you're not going to be paying exactly $99.99. But the store isn't going to settle for less than that amount because you don't feel like paying the tax.
__________________
http://collectorsedition.org/forums/...ead.php?t=9826 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is why the seller should cover any fees in their asking prices. So if they want $50, they ask for $52....or whatever the fee % equates to in their country.
Nobody is saying a seller should be out of pocket on fees. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|