FireFigures News

[Dr_Jengo]

Probably what Lowly said. If Ubisoft is going to make money out of this, why not give them the license? How much will the license cost depends on both them.

I wonder what happened to the Hot Toys license, maybe we will understand the situation a little better.

Still waiting for V's contact to update here and whoever else has contacted Ubisoft. They could also be not allowed to say for the time being. Just hoping everything reaches a conclusion soon

[webhead]

Originally Posted by Veron_4

Probably what Lowly said. If Ubisoft is going to make money out of this, why not give them the license? How much will the license cost depends on both them.

I wonder what happened to the Hot Toys license, maybe we will understand the situation a little better.

The problem I could see with this is that Ubisoft would not give them the license because of the product not meeting Ubisoft standards.

If you compare the Hot Toys figure to this one the Hot Toys just looks better all around.

[Dr_Jengo]

Originally Posted by webhead

The problem I could see with this is that Ubisoft would not give them the license because of the product not meeting Ubisoft standards.

If you compare the Hot Toys figure to this one the Hot Toys just looks better all around.

Not necessarily, they gave the license to McFarlane over NECA for the smaller figures.

[Mathika]

Originally Posted by Veron_4

Not necessarily, they gave the license to McFarlane over NECA for the smaller figures.

sadly

[Mathika]

I wonder what happened to the Hot Toys license, maybe we will understand the situation a little better.

HotToys only had the License for Assassins Creed 2;

HotToys is more like IronToys